Taking Skepticism Seriously: How the Zhuang-zi Can Inform Contemporary Epistemology
نویسنده
چکیده
This paper explores a few of the ways that the Zhuang-Zi can inform contemporary analytic epistemology. I begin, in section 1, by briefly outlining and summarizing the case for my fictionalist interpretation of the text. In section 2, I discuss how the Zhuang-Zi can be brought into productive dialogue with the question of how we should respond to skeptical arguments. Specifically, I argue that the Zhuang-Zi can be reasonably interpreted as exemplifying an approach that is different from dominant contemporary responses to skeptical arguments in three ways: (i) it is fictionalist; (ii) it motivates a skeptical perspective rather than a claim; and (iii) it accomplishes its aims in an atypical, but nonetheless contextually appropriate, way. However, the Zhuang-Zi is relevant to contemporary debates about skeptical arguments because it can be used: (i) to respond to the same sorts of skeptical arguments that occupy contemporary commentators; (ii) to address a number of questions that arise in connection with such arguments; and (iii) to suggest important new questions for epistemologists to pursue.
منابع مشابه
What the Skeptic Still Can’t Learn from How We Use the Word ‘Know’
Since its publication more than twenty years ago, Barry Stroud’s The Significance of Philosophical Scepticism has been widely read and discussed by philosophers who are interested in skepticism about our knowledge of the external world.1 Some of his later writings on the topic (such as Stroud (1989) and (1994)) are considered essential reading too. This does not, however, mean that what Stroud ...
متن کاملNotes for Week 4 of Contemporary Debates in Epistemology 02 / 11 / 09
In the first four chapters of Contemporary Debates in Epistemology, our attention is directed towards disputes concerning “Knowledge and Skepticism”. Though the debaters of these chapters (Dretske/Hawthorne, Conee/Cohen, Vogel/Fumerton, and BonJour/Devitt) appear to have specifically directed focuses, it is clear that they are concerned with the same kinds of underlying issues. It will be usefu...
متن کاملHealthy Skepticism and Practical Wisdom
This paper explores and articulates an alternative to the two main approaches that have come to predominate in contemporary philosophical discussions of skepticism. These we may call the ̳Foil Approach‘ and the ̳Bypass Approach‘ respectively. On the Foil Approach, skepticism is treated as a problem to be solved, or challenge to be met, or threat to be parried; skepticism‘s value, insofar as it ...
متن کاملPsychologist ) : The Value Of Taking ' ' Temporary Givens ' ' Seriously The Naive Epistemology of a Working Social Psychologist ( Or the Working Epistemology of a Naive Social
متن کامل
Learning How to Swim and Improving Self-Efficacy: Physical Education Needs to be Taken More Seriously
Learning How to Swim and Improving Self-Efficacy: Physical Education Needs to be Taken More Seriously M. Taslimi P. Iraannejaad, Ph.D. Z. Lebaadi, Ph.D. Physical education is not just for improving the functions and well-being of the body, as it can help with the improvement of the psychological functions as well. A physical, and enjoyable, activity such as swimming, as a p...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2017